f you had walked quietly into Grace Cathedral in San
Francisco two winters ago, you would have faced an unusual sight.
Exhibited on the church’s interior pillars were photographs of
homeless people, images that might have changed the content of your
prayers that morning.
Photographer Lucy Gray’s black-and-white portraits
are beautiful in themselves. Take away their message and they stand
alone as works of art. Contrast of light and shadow, soft clear tones,
lines that let the eye lead itself effortlessly through substance and
detail – all are there. But the message is Gray’s intent. These are
documentary works, photographs with a purpose. Each subject has been
photographed twice, “before” and “after,” first, as a homeless
person or couple in their daily poverty, and second, as models: dressed
in good clothes and posed as a commercial photographer might pose them
for a magazine shot. It is essentially a gimmick, but an indirect one,
designed to ask us to think differently about homeless people, to see
them differently.
What does the photographer want us to see? Homeless
people suddenly transformed into models, ideals, people “at their
peak,” as Gray writes in her accompanying text? Or people who could
easily be our friends and neighbors? What first catches my interest in
these photographs-with-a-purpose is the seeming ease, the relaxed
comfort of the subjects in their new, dressed-up roles.
Here is Rosemary McCord. She stands in a doorway, her
left hand gently supporting her in the frame. Behind her two small
paintings hang on a wooden wall, hung for pleasure, for fun, placed
off-center, for style, decoration, amusement. The expression on her face
is one of mild curiosity, a wait-and-see look at something in the middle
distance. For the matching “after” image, the photographer has
persuaded her to put on a sleeveless sweater, long black satin gloves, a
black feather necklace and a grand hat made of swirling white tulle
piled on top of dark straw. Her hair has been cut and darkened, shaped
in a chic French cut that ventures onto her cheek. It is the same face,
the same strong-looking woman rising to this odd occasion by posturing
as an actress might, mimicking slightly a pose that she thinks should go
with the clothing. The detail that delights – what Roland Barthes
would call the “punctum” – is the tattoo on her arm that is
wonderfully out of place in the high-style costume. But what strikes me
most about her – and about all of the subjects of these
before-and-after photographs – is how naturally she assumes a new role
in costume. She knows she is play-acting but the calm strength in her
face tells us that she is herself. She could have been wearing that hat
for years.
Look at the young couple sitting together on a
mattress, looking out from the open door of their van. They are “down
on their luck,” as the text tells us, but except for some litter in
the form of loose papers and a soda can, they appear content in their
situation. Their little cat sits alertly by. A pair of sneakers looks
clean, in good shape. After, when they are dressed in real clothes –
she in a strapless black dress and he in a good sweater and shiny
leather jacket – their smiles are broader but they are the same
people, capable of having fun, enjoying the moment.
Here also is Robert Simmons, who according to the
text, “blew it” with his wife and daughter, but with two years of
recovery he has gained back some of his life. In the first picture he is
standing alone in front of a wooded path that appears to lead nowhere,
his hands helplessly at his sides, looking at the camera with a bit of
annoyance in his face. In the second picture he is sitting up on a
comfortable-looking bed, dressed in pajamas and dressing gown, holding
the Money & Business section of the New
York Times and smiling, as if he were in agreeable
conversation with someone in the room. It is the same Robert Simmons.
What is surprising is the similarity, not the difference, between the
subject’s demeanor before and after. The same facial expression,
almost. The same humanity; it does not change with new clothes, a new
facade, or a new setting.
Now we see Richard Stephens, who survived a “near
fatal car crash” in 1997. In the first picture
he stands outside under a clothesline where a coat hangs by one small
strong clothespin. This, by itself, is a beautifully composed picture.
Indulging my own love of detail, I delight in the second clothespin on
the line. This clothespin has nothing to hold and looks like a free but
lonesome bird, filling no function. Richard Stephens’ expression in
the first picture is darkly serious, dignified, and it is the same in
the second picture, where he is dressed in a good suit and seated in
front of a full plate of food, holding up a glass of wine. A fine
picture punctuated by the expression on Richard Stephens’ face. We
expect to see some joy and we do not. He does not celebrate his new
situation because it is not real, it is a momentary play-act. He wonders
if a joke is being played on him. Is he toasting the photographer? Or
was he asked to hold up the glass and is going along with all of this,
dutifully and without pleasure? We look at his eyes and see dignity,
resignation, perhaps anger. I remain in front of him for a long time,
and while searching and longing for a clue to his thoughts, I linger
over the photographer’s composition – the elegant, rhymed placement
of a wine bottle and shakers of salt and pepper.
The human being is an entangled whole at all times in
all situations, no matter what deprivation he or she must endure. Lucy
Gray writes in her program notes: “These models are complex adults as
rich as reality. Just because they are in need doesn’t make them
simple.”
These photographs are subtle and completely engaging.
Who are their subjects? We are alike, we and they. We are difficult
creatures who share a common humanity. Lucy Gray’s pictures show –
not by a dramatic transformation of the subjects’ appearance before
and after but by the absence of transformation – that the homeless
can, with attention from us, move into lives not unlike those of most of
the churchgoers moving slowly along the aisles of Grace Cathedral.
See also:
Naming the Homeless: Portfolio
“Statement,” Lucy Gray
Contributors
next page
|